
The International Conference on Thai Studies is primarily a gathering of woolheads who lecture each other on all things exotica, but this year's event promises to spice up the package with a limited number of discussions and seminars about the place of the royal family in the Thai political landscape. This is an explosive subject and some doubt that anything severe or even slightly critical will be said about the royal family, but if you have some time on your hands, you might see about getting into the hot topic events. The best ones take place on Thursday, though Paul Handley, author of the above book, isn't expected to show.
International Conference on Thai Studies Home Page
Conference Program
Groundbreaking monarchy debate defies traditional Thai deference
Bangkok - A debate on the hitherto taboo subject of the role of the monarchy in Thailand starts behind closed doors Wednesday at Bangkok's Thammasat University, at a time of great political uncertainty and an outpouring of national devotion for the revered King Bhumibol Adulyadej.
The prestigious International Conference on Thai Studies, held every three years, has included several potentially explosive seminars that plainly deal with the role and future of the palace in Thai society - a discussion that normally only takes place privately in Thailand for fear of legal and social sanction.
The boldest - in Thai terms - discussion could take place when a panel of foreign and Thai professors debate the merits of a generally hostile and highly controversial recent biography of King Bhumibol, The King Never Smiles, that is banned in Thailand.
The book views the monarchy as an anachronism. The author, a former correspondent for the Far Eastern Economic Review, trashes the king's life to the extent of criticising his painting and saxophone playing.
The American author of the book, Paul Handley, who may never again be allowed into Thailand, will nevertheless present a paper about the powerful Privy Council at the conference, read in absentia by the chair.
The role of the Privy Council in Thailand is delicate because its chief, retired general and former prime minister Prem Tinsulanonda, is thought by many Thai analysts to be the main instigator behind a September 2006 coup that ousted controversial prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra.
Another presentation will consider abolishing the century-old lese majeste laws that are used to squash debate about the role of monarchy and have frequently been used as weapons in political squabbles.
These debates will take place over three days during the mourning period of the king's respected elder sister Princess Galayani, who died last week, reminding the nation that the late princess's brother is also an increasingly frail 80 years old.
The king is widely seen in Thailand as having played a vital restraining, correcting role for most of the time since his coronation in 1950. His son and heir, Crown Prince Maha Vajiralongkorn, is said by analysts to have little of his father's popularity, experience or dedication in the eyes of ordinary Thais.
This extraordinary examination of the role of the monarchy comes after some foreign academics proposed last year a boycott of the conference if its organisers rejected any papers that grappled with Thailand's contemporary political problems, alluding to a military and older elite contending for power with a ruthless and allegedly corrupt former telecommunications tycoon Thaksin.
This year's conference is officially themed around transnationalism and the erosion of borders in the modern world. Chris Baker, a Thai-based historian, wrote recently of the conference 'One border that may be swept away is the thick black line between what can be said inside the country, and what already is being said outside it.'
The boycott call appears to have fizzled out and popular Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn is scheduled to open the conference. All participants have been requested to wear black in memory of Princess Galayani.
Monsters and Critics
Andrew Walker at New Mandala has posted a reminder about a planned boycott of the event, due to the long-standing reluctance of scholars to publically talk about the monarchy, but it's a comment submitted by Thailand Jumps the Shark that reminds everyone of what might be the reality of this conference.
Identity politics reigns supreme. The program is dominated by race, class and gender post-modern bullshit. I think the world of tertiary education would shrivel up and die if the word “discourse” was eliminated from the lexicon.
But hey, guess what, a major conference on Thailand and nothing on the military and the coup, as if the coup didn’t happen at all. Maybe these professors and graduate students have deconstructed the military right out of existence.
No discourse on the multi-million dollar assets of Thai generals.
No discourse on martial law being implemented(in pro-Thaksin areas) during a vote for a constitution and an election for parliament.
No discourse on military generals in charge of major state corporate assets.
No discourse on how the military handpicked the courts and committees to go after their political enemies.
No critical discourse about how General Sonthi, the head of the junta, became the civilian deputy prime minister in charge of the election.
No discourse on military procurement.
No discourse on massive corruption in the bureaucracy.
No discourse on how the Thai media rolled over for the coup.
No discourse on how the top brass, the capitalist billionaires, the bureaucratic elite and the remnants of the ancien regime are never accountable to rule of law for fleecing the state while the poor and powerless rot in jail for petty crimes.
No discourse on the mafia-like police force.
No discourse on how the Thai media and the academy ignore the corrupt power structures at the top so that they can protect their own power and feudal privileges.
No discourse on why the Thai public school system is a national disgrace.
No problem, just have 5 more seminars on queers and katoeys to make up for the lack of discourse on real issues that affect real people.
And the seminars on the monarchy are a joke.
This is my prediction: Handley’s book will be nitpicked for insignificant factual errors in order to discredit the entire thesis. And the monarchy’s role in politics will not be discussed the way it should be discussed.
Everybody will be dressed in black and bow down to the emperor who has no clothes.
And it is shocking that there will be no clear and comprehensible discussion about a post-Bhumibol Thailand. His passing will have enormous repercussions on Thailand, which will impact all Thais in the future. You would think that a Thai Studies conference would have that topic up for discussion. Nope. Ignore the pink elephant standing the middle of the room. That is the responsible thing to do.
I wish I was there, I really do. I would have done a Hunter S Thompson live blogging of the conference.
New Mandala